Skip to main content

Google: Evil or not?

We all know Microsoft is evil. At least we've been told that so many times, we almost believe it. Similarly, Google was the good guy. The anti-Microsoft, the little guy that got big but still cared about the users and their privacy.

Well, disabuse your mind of that notion. Google is evil. At least on their way to being evil. Why? Read these 2 blog items:

consumerist.com
smoking gun

The gist of it: Google has been taking pictures of people's homes (without notice) and using it in its "Streets View". It's one thing to take pictures of public spaces but to drive into a private driveway, take high-rez pictures of private property, use it to make money and potentially expose the owners of the properties to burglary...if that's not evil, what is?

Case #2: Google keeps a history of your search activity. For a looong time.

Case #3: Google released "Google Search" and didn't even disclose that the software is really a webserver in disguise. What's the harm? Now your computer is exposed to potentially dangerous incoming traffic. Plus, running Google search renders your computer to any and all vulnerabilities in the webserver.

Case #4: Very similar practice to what Microsoft does. First it was simply search, then gmail, then google videos, then google checkout, then google talk, then orkut. Now they are out with something called "AppEngine" that's gonna compete with Amazon's S3 cloud computing.

While am not saying Google is wrong is expanding their empire, it's just ironic to me that this is exactly the kind of practice for which Microsoft is wildly criticize.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Career 101: Dunk, layup or dribble out of bounds?

Saw this on Whisper:


The way I see it, this dude has 3 options:
Reject the $55K increase and stick with his old job that he loves (dribble out of bounds)Take the $170K to his current boss and negotiate for a raise (layup)Take the $170K job, stick with it for a year and then bounce (dunk) The first option is what I call a poor person's advice. It sounds very noble...very "get a job you love and you'll never work". Well I am here to say that's bullshit (mostly). This is business; you should always get the most you can. Besides, this is a chance for this dude to change his baseline salary for future jobs. At his current job, getting that $55K will take several years because corporate America isn't going to offer you more than a token raise each year.

My advice would be to take the $170K offer to his current manager and get him/her to match it or raise his current salary. That's the layup option. It's not too money-hungry and doesn't summarily leave $5…

Strong, Likely Boy

Item # 19:

Infant. Age 1. Described as "Strong, Likely Boy" $400.00





What to do?

I recently bought one of those wireless earbuds from Amazon. I spent some time researching all the available options and finally picked this particular one. It was highly rated on Amazon 5 stars from 54 reviewers (most of them "verified purchase"). Not great but not bad. Anyway, the earbuds arrived and I found this in the box:

Hmm, OK. Very mysterious. As instructed, I sent them an email for further information. Here's what I received:

Funny thing is I really like the ear buds. Excellent build quality and thus far, great performance. They reconnect to my phone 2-3 seconds after taking them out of the case. It's easy to create a good seal...sometimes so good I get that underwater feeling one gets with noise cancelling headphones. Even without the 40% incentive, I would have written a review...that's how much I like the ear buds. But now I feel weird about doing it. I wonder how many of those 54 5-star reviews were motivated by a 40% discount.

As for the 40% discou…