Skip to main content

This is why I hate Apple

Sure their devices are sleek, cool and cost more than your mortage. But is it too much to ask that when I install 1 of their software, the installer doesn't install a bunch of other Apple crap that I don't need/want? 

First it was iTunes:
  • it doesn't work unless Quicktime is installed. Why I need another Apple video player as a pre-requisite for iTunes (a media player) is beyond me!
  • when you install iTunes, you get these "great" Apple software like "Bonjour", "Apple Software Update" (which isn't really a vehicle for delivering updates but one for delivering yet more Apple products to unsuspecting consumers). 
  • In addition to those, you get all sorts of Windows Services for managing iPhones even if you don't have one. 
I seem to remember there was a time Apple, Sun and others were against Microsoft bundling IE with Windows. I wonder how many MacBook Apple sells without all their iCrap software.

Today, I decided to try the beta version of Apple's Safari browser.  These are the installation screens:





This is the result of the installation:

Why does a browser need a separate updater? Why didn't Apple go the route of Firefox and Chrome, where the browser itself check for updates when you use it? And why for crying out loud is the updater pitching me Quicktime and iTunes? BTW, you'll notice from the screenshot below that all the "updates" are conveniently checked. What a bush league thing to do.





Comments

  1. I'm a huge advocate of all things Apple. Infact, I develop exclusively on the mac. I hate Microsoft, but it is required for all things .NET and SQL Server required for my day-2-day activities. The point of my rant is to say neither of the operating systems are perfect.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I know. All existing OS suck in some respect or the other. The only thing is Microsoft has never had me install a separate video player (i.e. Quicktime) just because I wanted to install a music/video player (iTunes). Also, Microsoft gets a lot of grief for their bad behavior but Apple seems to have more fanboys than true critics. Don't even get me started on the evils of Apple (did you know the new iPod shuffle requires specialized headphones that are either made by Apple or made by hardware manufacturers who are required to pay Apple a licensing fee? All for a freaking headphone to play music. Give me break. But you very rarely see that fact in any review of the shuffle. Everybody is so enamored with the small form factor).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Teenage Years Cometh

If you're lucky, a few days after your twins are born, the hospital just let's you walk out with them. In fact, they insist you take them with you. No training, no classes, no probation...they really just let you walk out with 2 humans. #fatherhood — Tundey A. (@realtundey) November 28, 2021 This was me 12 years ago: And now look at them. In a little over 6 months, they'll be teenagers!   Every time I look at them, I am reminded of Obama's quote on being a parent:  "One of my favorite sayings about having children is it's like having your heart walking around outside your body." — @POTUS — White House Archived (@ObamaWhiteHouse) October 21, 2015

Does InfoPath (still) suck?

A couple of years ago, I wrote a blog post titled "InfoPath & SharePoint (Part 1)". Back then I had just started working on a project using InfoPath 2007. So, expectedly, the post wasn't very complimentary to InfoPath (or SharePoint). In fact, I said: InfoPath sucks and SharePoint is the most expensive piece of crap ever. InfoPath, as a development environment, has absolutely no redeeming value. It's worthless.... ( more ) Since then my opinion of InfoPath has changed slightly. It still suffers from all the flaws I pointed out in that post. However, I think when used right, InfoPath can be an OK tool. I think it's well suited for designing one off forms and not for anything that requires complex logic or multiple iterations (like most software development requires). Alas, most CTOs fall in love with its point & click simplicity and integration with SharePoint that they try to use it to replace more developed technologies like ASP.NET. What do you get? A h

InfoPath & SharePoint (Part 1)

A departure from sports and politics. This one is about technology. InfoPath sucks and SharePoint is the most expensive piece of crap ever. InfoPath, as a development environment , has absolutely no redeeming value. It's worthless and if your boss ever thinks of using it, you have three options: convince him not to (not easy once he's been brainwashed by the Microsoft marketing presentations) use one of Al Gore 's lockboxes to store away your sanity 'cos you'll lose it. Also, pad your estimates very generously . You'll need every bit of time you can get. quit immediately while you still have your sanity First, InfoPath: To me InfoPath is like programming in assembly language . Sure it makes it easy (too easy in fact) to bind data to controls. But it doesn't provide you with easy access to your controls. Why is this important? Say you want to disable a button : in most technology: buttonA.enabled = false (or something similar). In InfoPath, you simply