Skip to main content

Like Frankenstein, the case of the curious charge from Enterprise is back alive....

A couple of months ago, I wrote about a curious charge of $40 from Enterprise (read the post for background). The gist of it is Enterprise Rental Car stuck me with a fee that they could not substantiate. They claimed I ran a toll while driving one of their cars and that they've:

  • decided to pay the fine for me
  • decided to charge me a 33% "admin fee" for that privilege
  • decided to wait several months before notifying 
  • decided to charge the fine + admin fee to my credit card.
So I did what anyone should: I called them to dispute it. Didn't get anywhere with them so I filed a dispute with American Express. After a couple of disputed charges, Amex ruled in my favor and I thought all was done. Well, guess what? It's not! Apparently, Enterprise really wants their money. So they've
  • decided to send me another notice (with no mention of our prior entanglement)
  • decided to change the fine from $30 to $25 (no reason given)
  • decided to call it a "parking fee" (that's what their customer service rep told me. When I told her that E-ZPass Maryland doesn't do parking, she didn't have a good explanation).
Anyway, I just called up Amex and explained the situation. They cancelled my card and another is in the e-mail. So now that Enterprise can't put unauthorized charges on my credit card, I would like to see what they do next. If it takes going to small claims court...well I have some vacation time saved up.

Yeah I know I've spent way more than $40 (in terms of time) on this case, but it's the principle (not principal) of the matter. 

BTW, someone from Enterprise apparently read my initial blog and got in contact with me. I have contacted him since I got the new letter and he's looking into the issue. So score 1 for their web "social network monitoring" group.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Career 101: Dunk, layup or dribble out of bounds?

Saw this on Whisper:


The way I see it, this dude has 3 options:
Reject the $55K increase and stick with his old job that he loves (dribble out of bounds)Take the $170K to his current boss and negotiate for a raise (layup)Take the $170K job, stick with it for a year and then bounce (dunk) The first option is what I call a poor person's advice. It sounds very noble...very "get a job you love and you'll never work". Well I am here to say that's bullshit (mostly). This is business; you should always get the most you can. Besides, this is a chance for this dude to change his baseline salary for future jobs. At his current job, getting that $55K will take several years because corporate America isn't going to offer you more than a token raise each year.

My advice would be to take the $170K offer to his current manager and get him/her to match it or raise his current salary. That's the layup option. It's not too money-hungry and doesn't summarily leave $5…

Strong, Likely Boy

Item # 19:

Infant. Age 1. Described as "Strong, Likely Boy" $400.00





What to do?

I recently bought one of those wireless earbuds from Amazon. I spent some time researching all the available options and finally picked this particular one. It was highly rated on Amazon 5 stars from 54 reviewers (most of them "verified purchase"). Not great but not bad. Anyway, the earbuds arrived and I found this in the box:

Hmm, OK. Very mysterious. As instructed, I sent them an email for further information. Here's what I received:

Funny thing is I really like the ear buds. Excellent build quality and thus far, great performance. They reconnect to my phone 2-3 seconds after taking them out of the case. It's easy to create a good seal...sometimes so good I get that underwater feeling one gets with noise cancelling headphones. Even without the 40% incentive, I would have written a review...that's how much I like the ear buds. But now I feel weird about doing it. I wonder how many of those 54 5-star reviews were motivated by a 40% discount.

As for the 40% discou…